In an article I wrote for the Philippine Online Chronicles around three months ago, I said that the biggest challenge that would confront the then newly-installed Prime Minister Naoto Kan would be a potential comeback by Ichiro Ozawa, the erstwhile shadow shogun whom Kan at that time humiliated and stripped of influence within the ruling Democratic Party of Japan (DPJ). At that time, I predicted that Ozawa would field one of his puppets to challenge Kan in the DPJ presidential elections this Sept. 14. I was wrong. Ozawa would pull a comeback, alright; but he is not appointing a puppet to run in the elections. He himself would challenge the Prime Minister.
The king-maker has decided to be the king himself.
This is so far biggest political surprise of this particularly turbulent year. Everybody knew that Ozawa would one day seek the position, but it was almost a consensus that he would not do so just yet simply because his popularity is at its lowest point right now. Opinion polls point out that around 63 to 78 percent of the public are opposed to Ozawa becoming Japan’s leader. Within the DPJ, the percentage is even higher: 80 percent of the 300,000 party members favor Kan over Ozawa. A Prime Minister Ozawa, therefore, would be a prime minister devoid of the people’s mandate.
So why did Ozawa, arguably the most savvy Japanese politician in recent history, decide to throw his hat to the ring at the least auspicious time? This is something that only Ozawa and perhaps people close to him could tell. But we can get a clue by understanding the context in which Ozawa, Kan and others are operating: an intriguing internal power struggle for control of the DPJ which in turn is an integral part of the on-going shadow battle for Japan’s political soul, something that should interest not just Japan observers but also all students of history and politics everywhere.
Just as China was protesting the draping of the Philippine flag on the coffin of Rolando Mendoza, the cop-turned-terrorist who murdered eight Hong Kong nationals in Manila last Monday, its submarines were returning home from a successful mission to plant a Chinese flag beneath the South China Sea. It was the latest act of renewed Chinese assertiveness in the disputed region and a demonstration of China’s underwater capabilities.
Of course, the flag-planting doesn’t give the Chinese what they don’t already have with regards to their claims to the South China Sea. It’s not the first time in recent years that China demonstrated unilateral assertiveness either. But the stunt was significant because it was a rebuke to the United States, which has recently weighed in on the dispute.
One thing that sucks in a democracy, especially in one where there is seperation of powers, is that politicians tend to grandstand by recklessly making uninformed comments. This is exactly what two Filipino senators did last week in the aftermath of the hostage-taking crisis in Manila that claimed the lives of eight Hong Kong natonals.
The day after the massacre, Senate President Juan Ponce-Enrile, a man also known for his xenophobic rudeness, said: “Why should we apologize? These things can happen anywhere in the world.”
Referring to the tsunami of condemnations that hit his organization’s handling of the Manila hostage crisis, Philippine National Police (PNP) spokesperson Agrimero Cruz yesterday made this irritating remark: “They (critics) are all in the gallery, watching. They should try being in the line of fire and let us see how they react.”
Many of my friends are pointing out the major defect of President Benigno S Aquino III’s first address to the Congress of the Philippines: His failure to present a long-term or even medium-term development roadmap that will guide his six-year tenure.
Indeed, the President made no mention of his new administration’s stance on important issues like agrarian reform, population control and foreign policy. It is understandable that he seems to accord foreign policy a low priority (this I think is the reason he has accommodated his sister’s alleged request to retain an embarrassingly incompetent and possibly corrupt Secretary of Foreign Affairs) because he seems to judge, quite rightly, that the Philippines must bring its own chaotic house in order first before venturing outside its borders. But it is sad that the President does not seem to see a sense of urgency in the worsening rural poverty that can only be solved through land reform and the ballooning population that can only be solved by proper family planning.
In the mere two months since he has taken office, Japanese Prime Minister Naoto Kan has known criticisms. They come from the media, the opposition, and even from within his own party. But the latest questions on his ability to govern came from a rather unusual source: his own wife.
In her book, So You’re Now The Prime Minister, What Would Change In Japan?, First Lady Nobuko Kan reveals many of her husband’s shortcomings: His notoriously-fragile temper, inability to do any household chore and his bad fashion sense. She also said she thinks her husband is a failure as a public speaker.
“I can’t help but feel a sense of wrongness,” writes the First Lady on her husband’s becoming the leader of the world’s second biggest economy. “Since I know him intimately, I ask myself, is it really okay to have him as the prime minister?”
There was a fantastic show in Caracas yesterday. The President of the Bolivarian Republic of Venezuela, Hugo Chavez, announced that he is cutting his country’s diplomatic ties with Colombia. Flanked by a visiting Argentine soccer figure, el comandante declared that his country might even go to war with its “brother nation.”
“We would go to war with Colombia weeping,” Chavez said. “But we would have to go.”
And why would el comandante attack Colombia? Because its outgoing president, Alvaro Uribe, has presented to the Organization of American States (OAS) pieces of evidence– including eyewitness accounts, photographs and maps– supposedly proving that Chavez is in fact coddling the leftist Revolutionary Armed Forces of Colombia (FARC).
Outrageous, says Chavez. Uribe is doing this to spark war! He is setting up a fake FARC camp in one of the jungles of Venezuela and attack it to bring about war! Que barbaridad!
The self-proclaimed reincarnation of the Buddha, 53-year-old Tokyo University graduate Ryuho Okawa, said the spirit guide of North Korean leader Kim Jong-il has informed him of the dictator’s plans to nuke Osaka , Nagoya and Tokyo . To prevent this, he said Japan must amend its pacifist constitution and prepare for battle with China and North Korea . To this end, he has founded the Happiness Realization Party, one of several political blocs vying for seats in the House of Councillors in the upcoming July 11 elections.
Only in the Philippines do you see an effort to impeach a president a day after his inauguration.
(more…)
ABOVE: Trailer of the 1977 movie “MacArthur” starring Gregory Peck.
An act of contempt against civilian authority.
This was how most observers described the scornful comments made by the commander of the US and NATO forces in Afghanistan, General Stanley McChrystal, and members of his staff against high officials of the Obama administration. To give you an idea how scornful the remarks were, they described National Security Adviser Jim Jones as “a clown.”
And if you consider the fact that it was already Strike Three for McChrystal (Strike One was when he forced the hand of the president by leaking his recommendations of increasing the number of troops in Afghanistan to the press while Strike Two was when he criticized Vice President Biden’s opposition to the surge in a speech in London), you just have to wonder if General Douglas MacArthur has in fact returned.